DEPARTMENT OF STATE DEVELOPMENT -v- LATRO LAWYERS [2016] WASC 108

SUPREME COURT OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA
[2016] WASC 108
N/A
GDA 5/2015
9 MARCH 2016
BEECH J
06/04/2016
Perth
Appeal upheld
B
DEPARTMENT OF STATE DEVELOPMENT
LATRO LAWYERS
Administrative law
Freedom of information
Procedural fairness
Exempt matter
Whether primary judge erred in approach to question of what could reasonably be expected to follow from disclosure
Freedom of Information Act 1992 (WA), sch1 cl4(3)
Apache Northwest Pty Ltd v Agostino (No 2) [2009] WASCA 232
Apache Northwest Pty Ltd v Department of Mines & Petroleum (No 2) [2011] WASC 283
Apache Northwest Pty Ltd v Department of Mines & Petroleum [2012] WASCA 167
Attorney-General v Cockcroft (1986) 10 FCR 180
Collector of Customs v Pozzolanic Enterprises Pty Ltd [1993] FCA 322
(1993) 43 FCR 280
Commissioner for Australian Capital Territory Revenue v Alphaone Pty Ltd (1994) 49 FCR 576
McKay v Commissioner of Main Roads [2013] WASCA 135
Mijatovic v Legal Practitioners Complaints Committee [2008] WASCA 115
(2008) 37 WAR 149
Muin v Refugee Review Tribunal [2002] HCA 30
(2002) 76 ALJR 966
Osland v Secretary to the Department of Justice (No 2) [2010] HCA 24
(2010) 241 CLR 320
Plaintiff S10/2011 v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2012] HCA 31
(2012) 246 CLR 636
Polo Enterprises Australia Pty Ltd v Shire of Broome [2015] WASCA 201
(2015) 49 WAR 134
Re Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs
Ex parte Lam [2003] HCA 6
(2003) 214 CLR 1
Re Minister for Resources
Ex parte Cazaly Iron Pty Ltd [2007] WASCA 175
(2007) 34 WAR 403
Re Refugee Review Tribunal
Ex parte Aala [2000] HCA 57
(2000) 204 CLR 82
SZBEL v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2006] HCA 63
(2006) 228 CLR 152
N/A
Back to List